Format your paper so all of the text is double-spaced and there is a 1-inch margin on all sides. Your paper should include four major sections: On the next line, write a concise summary of your critique. This should be a brief summary about the article and your critique. Examples of points to make in this paragraph include objectively analyzing the article and evaluating its contributions to learning.
This paragraph should be between to words. On a new page, type your title at the top of the page without any additional formatting. Following a double space, begin writing your critique. Journal critiques analyze a variety of topics. Examples of issues you may want to include in this section include whether you found any errors of fact or interpretation, the author had any underlying assumptions or the author was objective.
If you are critiquing a research journal, then consider discussing whether the experimental methods were described adequately, the procedures included enough detail to be duplicated or any content was duplicated. To strengthen your journal critique, you may want to quote or paraphrase sections from the original article. Whenever you do this, you must include in-text citations. Does the author responsibly and effectively utilize emotional appeals to the audience?
Does the author include adequate reference to the opposition and respond to that opposition appropriately? The SMGW suggests evaluating for the following issues: Is topic clearly explained and sufficiently focused?
Does the content fit the audience? Is it organized effectively? Are sources used sufficiently, effectively, and appropriately? You might also assess the following criteria: Does the author utilize vivid detail, interesting examples, and lively language?
Does the essay avoid emphasizing judgment over explanation? Does the essay have a clear focus or implied thesis? Does the essay identify significant and parallel characteristics for comparison? Does the author adequately explain, analyze, or reflect on the comparison or contrast? Does the author provide appropriate transitions words to indicate comparison and contrast? Is the treatment of each side of the comparison or contrast in balance?
Does the essay provide sufficient, relevant, and interesting details? Feature Article Critique Does this article interest you? Do you think it will interest the intended audience? Can you suggest ways to increase interest?
Does the author avoid editorial judgment on the subject while still keeping the purpose clear? Has the writer done sufficient research? What questions have gone unasked or unanswered? Whose point of view or what information would add further to the completeness of the feature? Is the subject presented vividly with sensory images, graphic detail, and figurative language?
Do you have suggestions of details or images to include? Does the writer use an appropriate mixture of anecdote, quotation, description, and explanation? Would more or less of one of these improve the essay?
Are the beginning and ending paragraphs interesting and appropriate for the specific audience? Documented Argument Critique Is the thesis clear, argumentative, and effective? Why or why not? Are the topic and thesis are reasonable for the assignment, audience, and context of the essay?
Does the author define his or her terms and provide sufficient background information? What ideas or terms are undefined or inadequately explained? Is the thesis supported by clear reasons? It can help you develop your thesis statement.
This is a question that you will ask yourself while you read the text. Take notes on your emotional responses to different parts of the text to help you write your critique later. You will ask yourself this question when explaining what types of evidence or arguments are used in the work.
Consider how the author of the work uses other sources, their own evidence, and logic in their arguments. Click on another answer to find the right one This statement should address the overall success of the work.
If so, how did it achieve this success? If not, what went wrong? Examine the prompt or assignment. Be sure you understand exactly what you are being asked to do. Keep in mind some questions and take notes as you read. These will help guide your formulation of your ideas later. If not, why do you think that is? This can be crucial to determining the success of a work; for example, a movie intended for young children might work well for its intended audience but not for adult viewers.
What reactions do you have when reading or viewing this work? Does it provoke emotional responses? Do you feel confused? What questions does the work make you think of? Does it suggest other avenues of exploration or observation to you? You usually will not need to do a lot of research, but in order to talk about how the work relates to a larger issue or context, you will need to know what it is responding to, what context it was created in, etc.
As another example, if you're writing about a movie, you might want to briefly discuss the director's other films, or other important movies in this particular genre indie, action, drama, etc. Your school or university library is usually a good place to start when conducting research, as their databases provide verified, expert sources.
Google Scholar can also be a good source for research. Part 1 Quiz Why is it important to do additional research before writing your critique? So you can discuss the work in a broader context. So that you fully understand what type of critique you're writing. So that your critique stands out from those of your classmates. Give the basic information about the work. The first paragraph is your introduction to the work, and you should give the basic information about it in this paragraph.
For a film, you may wish to refer to a source such as IMDb to get the information you need. If you're critiquing a famous artwork, an encyclopedia of art would be a good place to find information on the creator, the title, and important dates date of creation, date of exhibition, etc.
Provide a context for the work. Just give your reader enough information to be able to understand the rest of your critique. If you are assessing a novel, it could be good to talk about what genre or literary tradition the novel is written within e. This element should consider what the thesis or purpose of the work is.
Sometimes, this may be clearly stated, such as in a research article. The authors of research articles will often state very clearly in the abstract and in the introduction to their work what they are investigating, often with sentences that say something like this: For example, if you were examining the movie The Shining, you might argue that the filmmaker Stanley Kubrick's goal is to call attention to the poor treatment of Native Americans because of the strong Native American themes present in the movie.
You could then present the reasons why you think that in the rest of the essay. Summarize the main points of the work. Describe, briefly, how the main points are made. For example, you might talk about a work's use of characters or symbolism to depict its point about society, or you could talk about the research questions and hypotheses in a journal article.
For example, if you were writing about The Shining, you could summarize the main points this way: Present your initial assessment. Is your evaluation going to be principally positive, negative, or mixed?
You may also wish to critique the research methodology, if there are obvious flaws present. For creative works, consider what you believe the author or creator's goal was in making the work, and then present your assessment of whether or not they achieved that goal. Part 2 Quiz Why should you provide the reader with context for the work?
So that the reader knows the full history of the work. So that your introductory paragraph is as long as your other paragraphs.
So the reader has enough information to understand the rest of your critique. Organize your critical evaluations. These should form the bulk of your critique and should be a minimum of three paragraphs.
You can choose to organize your critique differently depending on how you want to approach your critique. However, you should devote a paragraph to each main topic, using the rest of the steps in this section to develop each paragraph's discussion. If you have more than three points about your work, you can organize each paragraph thematically.
Discuss the techniques or styles used in the work. This is particularly important when evaluating creative works, such as literature, art, and music.
Study English at Goshen College. Whenever you read an essay, use the following questions to guide your response. First, keep in mind that, although you may not be a writing expert, you are THE reader of this essay and your response is a valid one.
How to Write a Good Critique Essay The word "criticize," has by definition and perception largely negative connotations attached. Students may dread having their creative writing critiqued in a .
Research Critique Guidelines. To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, address each component below for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment and the quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment. General guidelines for writing Critical or Rhetorical Analysis essay.
The term critique can cover a wide range of paper formats, but in general a critique is an assessment of a piece of writing, usually a book, article, or essay. This might be something as simple as a personal response to a novel or it might mean a more scholarly analysis of an academic article. View Notes - Critique Essay Guidelines from ENG at Cleveland State University. English Schantz The Critique Essay What's a Critique? A critique, according to Stephen Wilhoit, is a ”formal.