What if one finds themselves terminally ill, in excruciating pain, and no longer wishes to waste their life withering away in a hospital bed. Due to these reasons, certain forms of assisted suicide should be considered legal. Euthanasia is advantageous in many more ways than disadvantageous. It can help a patient in numerous ways: It is a fact that there are many diseases out there that can cause a patient excruciating amount of pain.
For instance, blood cancer can include symptoms such as bone fractures, repeated infections, and persisting bruises. Life is hard to live with any sort of terminal illness, in many cases death may be the better answer. Not letting people practice Euthanasia goes against the freedom promised in America. Every person in this country has rights: If a terminally ill person wants to avoid excruciating pain and wants to end their life in a dignified manner, it is implied in the concept of ordered liberty.
The right to exercise euthanasia is something one can choose for themselves and the courts should have as much a say in this matter as they do in matters such as marriage, family relationships, procreation, and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment.
We are said to live in a free country where we can make our own decisions, but are we really free if we cannot even make the choice to live or not live our own lives. The ideas against Euthanasia or assisted suicide are flawed in several different ways. First of all, the Hippocratic Oath very clearly states: Also, the Oath has been changed many times throughout history so what is different now.
Before, the oath prohibited the cutting open of a patient, but now surgery is used worldwide. The oath can be altered to fit the reality of the time. Second of all, in a society of people obsessed with the cost of health care, Euthanasia is regarded with the dangers of a slippery slope. He suffers with congestive heart failure, which one can live with but which if not treated or maintained properly will cause a painful death.
He offers his first hand account of meeting with the Grim Reaper: I lay at the point of death. A congestive heart failure was treated for diagnostic purposes by an angiogram that triggered a stroke.
Violent and painful hiccups, uninterrupted for several days and nights, prevented the ingestion of food. My left side and one of my vocal chords became paralyzed. Some form of pleurisy set in, and I felt like I was drowning in a sea of slime. In one of my lucid intervals during those days of agony, I asked my physician to discontinue all life-supporting services or show me how to do it.
Hook feels as though he was robbed of the peaceful serenity of death and will have to suffer through it once more, when death comes knocking again. Arguments for and against euthanasia are cause for major debate. Proponents and opponents disagree on at least four controversial issues. The four major issues are, but not limited to, the nature autonomy, the role of beneficence, the distinction between active and passive euthanasia and the public and social implications of legalization. The nature of autonomy basically means that all people are granted the right to think, feel and act for him or herself.
The distinction between passive and active euthanasia, or killing and allowing one to die. Euthanasia is a serious topic because it goes against the norms of traditional medicine. Euthanasia is not always applied to terminally patients either. People who have been in serious accidents, or who have debilitating diseases such as severe cases of Cerebral Palsy, Multiple Sclerosis, Muscular Dystrophy, and Cerebral Vascular Diseases which lead to strokes and heart attacks are often in consideration for the application of euthanasia.
In other words, these patients cannot act or speak for themselves or in addition, respond to much stimulus. Personal experience and opinion may be a factor that weighs heavily on the issue of euthanasia, but the real substance comes from the facts.
The legal ramifications play a major role in the legalization of euthanasia. Euthanasia began with its roots in both the Hippocratic tradition and the Judeo-Christian ethic of sanctity of life, Western medicine has long opposed the practice of physician-assisted suicide. However, the controversy over euthanasia is not new. Ohio is the only state in the United States of America that does not explicitly prohibit euthanasia by jurisdiction of the federal law.
Patients have the right to given alternatives to euthanasia and time to evaluate them before making informed consent. There are many legal procedures that pertain to euthanasia and sometimes patients enter a legal agreement with the hospital administration to consider euthanasia in case they are in incurable and terminal conditions. The patient must sign a legal agreement to confirm that they have agreed to choose euthanasia Smith, As a result, doctors have full medical record of the patient that can guarantee that the doctor has done thorough diagnosis to prescribe euthanasia to the patient.
In addition, hospitals have technology facilities that ensure accurate data is before choosing euthanasia Paterson, Moreover, euthanasia on patients who provide the consent to the doctors before they proceed to terminate their lives. In both situations, euthanasia is applicable with or without the consent of the patient; as a result, this justifies the right to euthanize patients. See sample definition essays here. The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law: You must be logged in to post a comment.
Euthanasia Argumentative Essay Example. Home Euthanasia Argumentative Essay Example. That the patient can be making the decision under his or her conscience or consent.
The Case for Euthanasia - In order to provide a framework for my thesis statement on the morality of euthanasia, it is first necessary to define what euthanasia is and the different types of euthanasia.
Euthanasia essays / Euthanasia The Right To Die Euthanasia The Right To Die With Dignity Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is a very sensitive issue debated in this country today. Euthanasia is the act of painlessly ending the life of a person for the reason of mercy.
Euthanasia essay Carrie Shell Mrs. Arnold English 31 October Euthanasia For several years, euthanasia has been a subject of controversy. Euthanasia is a fairly new problem for the United States and has gained a horrible reputation from negative media publicity surrounding the issue. Euthanasia is a serious political, moral and ethical issue in today’s society. Most people either strictly forbid it or firmly favor euthanasia. Although, I have no political background or confirmed religion, I choose to formally educate myself on the matter of euthanasia.
Remember this is a euthanasia argumentative essay example. Euthanasia Persuasive Essay. Euthanasia violates nature’s rules that even doctors do not have the right to deprive a patient of his life. Opponents in the euthanasia essay debate argue that euthanasia is killing the patient without his or her consent. Arguments For And Against Euthanasia Essay Words 8 Pages Euthanasia is the practice of ending an individual's life in order to relieve them from an incurable disease or unbearable suffering.